Nonresponse Bias and Measurement Bias in a Comparison of Face to Face and Telephone Interviewing

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Polyvictimization in Developmental Context (2011, background): “Indeed, extraordinary efforts to obtain higher response rates by persuading reluctant respondents to participate may actually add bias to survey responses (Biemer, 2001; Groves & Couper, 1998).”
Mixed mode designs: finding the balance between nonresponse bias and mode effects (2005, background): “That these probabilities are indeed different is known from the survey literature (Biemer 2001; Day et al. 1995; De Leeuw and Van der Zouwen 1988; Goyder 1985; Hox and De Leeuw 1994).”
Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires: Comparisons of Respondent Satisficing and Social Desirability Response Bias (2003, background): “90 91 Aquilino and LoSciuto 1989, 1990 X Gfroerer and Hughes 1991 X Biemer 1997, 2001 X Sykes and Collins 1987, 1988 X X Unconfounded mode comparisons not RDD versus area probability national samples: Aquilino 1994 X Aquilino 1998 X de Leeuw and Hox 1993 X Aneshensel et al. 1982 X Quinn, Gutek, and…”