The Structure of Time

By V. Evans. 2003

398 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/846f6169244a732fb0b04d1fa97d67644a3f0409

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Raymond W. Gibbs Jr.
2. Rafael E. Núñez
3. Nuria Sagarra
4. Markus Tendahl
5. Eve Sweetser
6. Benjamin A. Motz
7. U. Teuscher
8. Nick C. Ellis

In Social Psychology

1. Rafael E. Núñez
2. Raymond W. Gibbs Jr.
3. Markus Tendahl
4. Eve Sweetser
5. Benjamin A. Motz
6. U. Teuscher
7. Nick C. Ellis
8. Nuria Sagarra

Citations in the corpus

• With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time (2006, methodology): “The Time-RP metaphor is similar to what Evans (2003) called the Complex Temporal Sequence Model in that both invoke a sequence, and neither of them require a specification of present, past, and future.”
• Time After Time: The Psychological Reality of the Ego- and Time-Reference-Point Distinction in Metaphorical Construals of Time (2006, methodology): “1The Time-RP metaphor is similar to what Evans (2003) has called he Complex Temporal Sequence model, in that both invoke a sequence and neither of them require a specification of present, past, and future.”
• THE BOUNDS OF ADULT LANGUAGE ACQUISITION (2010, background): “Any stretch of discourse typically uses a selection of these cues in combination (e.g., yesterday I walked to the university but next Tuesday I’ll ride the bus ) (Evans, 2003 ).”
• The meaning of time: polysemy, the lexicon and conceptual structure (2005, methodology): “Such IMAGE-SCHEMAS are held to be embodied, in the sense that they arise from PERCEPTUAL ANALYSIS of recurring sensorimotor patterns in everyday experience (Johnson 1987; Mandler 1992, 1996; Tyler & Evans 2003).”
• Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. (2008, background): “A few cognitive linguists suggest that some proposals on polysemy are more reflective of what linguists think, or believe, than they are representative of the linguistic behaviour of ordinary speakers (Evans, 2003; Sandra and Rice, 1995).”