Municipal Service Provision Choices within a Metropolitan Area
By P. Joassart-Marcelli, Juliet A. Musso. 2005
124 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84508deb0c66bbbec50b045ac57465cec38dc15e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- M. Warner
- A. Hefetz
- G. Bel
- E. Vigoda-Gadot
- F. González‐Gómez
- Andrés J. Picazo‐Tadeo
- Jorge Guardiola
- António F. Tavares
Citations in the corpus
- WHY DO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS PRIVATIZE THE PROVISION OF WATER SERVICES? EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM SPAIN (2011, background): “Joassart-Marcelli and Musso (2005) analyze the choice of management made for eight types of municipal services.”
- Insourcing and Outsourcing (2012, background): “Suburbs have historically had the highest rates of contracting while metro core and rural communities have had lower rates (Heftez et al., 2012b; Hirsch, 1995; Joassart-Marcelli & Musso, 2005).”
- Privatization and Intermunicipal Contracting: The US Local Government Experience 1992–2007 (2012, methodology): “Regional government is uncommon in the United States, and the need for coordination is typically addressed with market mechanisms by contracting with other governments (intermunicipal contracting) or to private fi rms (privatization) (Joassart-Marcelli and Musso, 2005; Warner, 2006).”
- Local service delivery choices in Portugal: A political transaction costs framework (2007, background): “…focusing on a wider range of options, including private, public, and non-governmental sector alternatives, has gained much attention (Frant, 1997; Warner & Hebdon, 2001; Warner & Hefetz, 2002; Brown & Potoski, 2003b; Clingermayer et al., 2003; Feiock et al., 2003; Joassart-Marcelli & Musso, 2005).”
- Factors explaining inter-municipal cooperation in service delivery: a meta-regression analysis (2016, background): “Suburbs, as similar sized localities in the metropolitan region, offer the most attractive market for cooperation (Warner and Hefetz 2002; Joassart-Marcelli and Musso 2005; Hefetz, Warner, and Vigoda-Gadot 2012).”