Dung beetle movements at two spatial scales

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Potential distribution modelling, niche characterization and conservation status assessment using GIS tools: A case study of Iberian Copris species (2005, background): “Western Palaearctic temperate dung beetle populations have been estimated to have an approximate size of 1 km2 (Roslin, 2000, 2001a,b; Roslin and Koivunen, 2001).”
Measuring the dispersal of saproxylic insects: a key characteristic for their conservation (2006, unknown): “2000), but in several empirical studies the power function has fitted better with field data (Hill et al. 1996; Baguette et al. 2000; Roslin 2000).”
Short‐ and long‐range dispersal of medfly, Ceratitis capitata (Dipt., Tephritidae), and its invasive potential (2007, background): “Both conditions can be met when the distribution of dispersal distances (DDD) has a fat tail , whereby the rate of fall in frequency at longer distances is relatively low (when compared with the predictions of a negative exponential model), because it conforms instead to an inverse power model (Flet”
Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics (2005, unknown): “To be able to compare movement at the same and different scales, future research must take scale into account to a greater extent than it has previously (Wiens, 1989; Thomas & Kunin, 1999; Roslin, 2000).”