Scientometrics in a changing research landscape

By Lutz Bornmann, Loet Leydesdorff. EMBO Reports, 2014

323 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Management Information Systems, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8425b212ef0ec6d99b1e9bf422f8f8004e2f5923

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

1. John C. Mingers
2. Loet Leydesdorff
3. Ismael Rafols
4. Chaomei Chen
5. Ludo Waltman
6. Saif M. Mohammad
7. José M. Merigó
8. Jianbo Yang

In Management Information Systems

1. John C. Mingers
2. Shirley Gregor
3. Henri Barki
4. Janine L. Spears

In Statistics and Probability

1. John C. Mingers
2. Loet Leydesdorff
3. Chaomei Chen
4. Ismael Rafols
5. Judit Bar-Ilan
6. Saif M. Mohammad
7. José M. Merigó
8. Jianbo Yang

Citations in the corpus

• A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015, background): “Fifth, we must be aware that often problems are caused not by the data or metrics themselves, but by their inappropriate use either by academics or by administrators (Bornmann & Leydesdorff, 2014; van Raan, 2005b).”