Effectiveness of the derived Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C) in screening for alcohol use disorders and risk drinking in the US general population.

By D. Dawson, B. Grant, F. Stinson, Yuan Zhou. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 2005

700 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Evaluating the psychometric properties of the AUDIT-C among college students (2015, background): “Use of variable cut-off scores for men and women has been identified as a way to improve the sensitivity and specificity of the AUDIT-C (Aalto et al., 2006; Dawson et al., 2005; Kaarne et al., 2010).”
Alcohol: Effects on Neurobehavioral Functions and the Brain (2007, background): “Risky drinking patterns for men are defined as consuming more than 14 drinks per week, or more than four drinks in a single day at least once a month; for women, the limits are more than seven drinks per week and three drinks per day (Dawson et al. 2005).”
The alcohol use disorders identification test: an update of research findings. (2007, background): “…disorder Dependence 4 0.94 0.59 0.88 5 0.91 0.71 Any AUD 4 0.88 0.65 0.85 5 0.81 0.71 Any AUD or risk drinking 4 0.91 0.83 0.95 5 0.85 0.96 Dawson et al. (2005b) NESARC male general population in U.S. Males Past year drinkers Dependence 4 0.94 0.58 0.87 5 0.89 0.72 Any AUD 4 0.88 0.63…”