Amartya Sen's Capability Approach: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Applications

By Wiebke Kuklys. 2005

394 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/83ab9c5f63ce9905e23bf280bb4c7e5cbec0ebe3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

On Exact Statistical Properties of Multidimensional Indices Based on Principal Components, Factor Analysis, MIMIC and Structural Equation Models (2008, unknown): “Its variance is given by Vðf̂ Þ ¼ BVðxÞB0 þ ðI þ K0W 1KÞ 1ðK0W 1KÞ Di Tommaso (2006) and Kuklys (2005) present two important applications of this methodology for welfare measurement.”
Disability and poverty : a survey of World Bank poverty assessments and implications (2009, background): “Kuklys (2005) goes on to address the importance of disability in assessing poverty.”
Setting weights in multidimensional indices of well-being (2008, methodology): “In this line, Multiple Indicator and Multiple causes model (MIMIC) and structural equation model (SEM) have been proposed to construct multidimensional indices, particularly among those supporting the capability approach (Di Tommaso 2006, Kuklys 2005, Krishnakumar 2007, Krishnakumar & Ballon 2007).”
Disability and Poverty in Vietnam (2011, background): “In the United Kingdom, once the extra costs of living with a disability were accounted for, the relation between disability and poverty rose dramatically (Kuklys 2005).”
Capabilities and Satisfaction with Life (2007, methodology): “I follow the analysis of Pattanaik and Xu (2007), but closely related findings have been proven by Brun and Tungodden (2004) and by Fleurbaey (2005).”
The Development of Capability Indicators (2009, background): “…applications can be found in Schokkaert and van Ootegem (1990), Qizilbash (1996, 2004), Chiappero-Martinetti (2000), Layte et al. (2000), Laderchi (2001), Alkire (2002a, 2002b), Burchardt and Le Grand (2002), Burchardt and Zaidi (2003), Clark (2003), Kuklys (2005), and Anand et al. (2009).”
The Capability Approach: Insights for a New Poverty Focus (2011, background): “…to support a multidimensional poverty analysis focussing on health, education, employment, housing, social relationships and economic resources; Kuklys (2005) focussed on outcomes in health and housing, while Bonvin and Dif-Pradalier (2010) have emphasised the importance of the capability for…”
Capability Approach and Fuzzy Set Theory: Description, Aggregation and Inference Issues (2006, background): “4 As pointed out by Kuklys (2005) while Xi i represents the resource constraint, hi and ei can be interpreted as non-monetary constraints. count, distinguishing what individuals can do from what they actually do5.”
Weights in Multidimensional Indices of Wellbeing: An Overview (2013, unknown): “Further sophistication of factor analysis include multiple indicator and multiple causes models (MIMIC) and structural equation models (SEM), which have been proposed to construct multidimensional indices, particularly in the operationalization of Sen’s capability approach (Di Tommaso, 2006; Kuklys,”
Monitoring Inequality among Social Groups: A Methodology Combining Fuzzy Set Theory and Principal Component Analysis1 (2008, unknown): “Similarly, some multidimensional studies in the CA double count attributes and give implicitly more weight to certain dimensions over others (cf. Brandolini and D’Alessio, 1998; Chiappero Martinetti, 2000; Qizilbash, 2002; Kuklys, 2005).”
Choosing dimensions: the capability approach and multidimensional poverty. CPRC Working Paper No. 88. (2007, unknown): “9 See Alkire 2006, Kuklys 2005, Robeyns 2006 # ' " = # & " ' , !”