A meta-analytic review of the approach-avoidance achievement goals and performance relationships in the sport psychology literature
By M. Lochbaum, Jarrett Gottardy. 2015
114 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract Purpose To summarize the approach-avoidance achievement goal and performance in the sport psychology literature. Methods A total of 17 published studies, two of which provided two samples, were located. Accepted meta-analytic procedures were used with Hedges g as the effect size metric. From the 17 studies, 73 effect sizes were calculated. Results Results based on a random effects model indicated that the performance goal contrast had the largest facilitative impact on performance followed by the mastery and performance approach goals. Both of the avoidance goals performance and mastery had small non-significant and detrimental effects on performance. The homogeneity statistics revealed significant heterogeneity for the approach and avoidance performance goals. Categorical moderator variables were examined for study sex composition (male, female, or mixed), mean age of sample ( Conclusion The performance goal contrast holds value for sport performance research. Contrary to approach-avoidance predictions, the mastery-approach goal and performance effect size was significant and of equal magnitude as the performance approach goal and performance effect size. Thus, future research should closely test the efficacy of both the mastery- and performance contrasts in impacting performance of sport tasks. Last, the significant effect sizes reported in this review are in stark contrast to contemporary meta-analytic findings in education. Differences in the approach-avoidance goals in sport and education relative to performance should be researched further.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/83a3e039065ccef31b166f4cd9b9b37a5e4ce143
Citations in the corpus
- Performance-Approach Goal Effects Depend on How They Are Defined: Meta-Analytic Evidence From Multiple Educational Outcomes (2017, unknown): “…meta-analyses (Baranik, Stanley, Bynum, & Lance, 2010; Cellar et al., 2011; Huang, 2011a, 2011b; Hulleman, Schrager, Bodmann, & Harackiewicz, 2010; Lochbaum & Gottardy, 2015; Payne, Youngcourt, & Beaubien, 2007; Van Yperen, Blaga, & Postmes, 2014, 2015; Wirthwein, Sparfeldt, Pinquart, Wegerer, &…”