Willingness to pay for reduced visual disamenities from offshore wind farms in denmark

By J. Ladenburg, A. Dubgaard. 2007

287 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Measuring the Environmental Benefits of Wind-Generated Electricity (2013, background): “Wind farms are often opposed because of the the aesthetic damage they inflict on the landscape or because of noise "pollution"(Ladenburg and Dubgaard 2007).”
Attitudes towards offshore wind farms--The role of beach visits on attitude and demographic and attitude relations (2010, background): “Ladenburg (2008, 2009b), Firestone and Kempton (2007), Bishop and Miller (2007), Ladenburg and Dubgaard (2007) and Lilley et al. (2009) all find a general negative age and attitude/ perception towards offshore wind farm relations.”
Valuation of environmental and societal trade-offs of renewable energy sources (2013, background): “It causes negative landscape effects and is detrimental to bird and bat populations (Johnson et al., 2003; Kikuchi, 2008; Ladenburg and Dubgaard, 2007).”
Landscape externalities from onshore wind power (2010, methodology): “1 For a detailed description of choice experiments see Louviere et al. (2000), Bennett and Blamey (2001) or Hensher et al.”
Ecological and economic cost-benefit analysis of offshore wind energy (2009, background): “They found that respondents were willing to pay 46, 96 and 122 Euros per year per household in order to move a theoretical wind farm to 12, 18 or 50 km away from the coast, relative to an 8 km baseline [5].”