The big two dictionaries: Capturing agency and communion in natural language

By Agnieszka Pietraszkiewicz, Magdalena Formanowicz, Marie Gustafsson Sendén, R. Boyd, Sverker Sikström, Sabine Sczesny. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2019

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Four studies developed and validated two dictionaries to capture agentic and communal expressions in natural language. Their development followed the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) approach (Study 1) and we tested their validity with frequency-based analyses and semantic similarity measures. The newly developed Agency and Communion dictionaries were aligned with LIWC categories related to agency and communion (Study 2), and corresponded with subjective ratings (Study 3), confirming their convergent validity. Very low or absent correspondence between proposed dictionaries and unrelated LIWC categories demonstrated their discriminant validity (Study 2). Finally, we applied both dictionaries to language used in advertisements. In correspondence to gender stereotypes, male-dominated jobs were advertised with more agentic than communal words, and female-dominated jobs with more communal than agentic words (Study 4). Both dictionaries represent reliable tools for quantifying agentic and communal content in natural language, and will improve and facilitate future research on agency and communion.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/839f2935895a461718f1e370f080ed50fe62bb8a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Xuechunzi Bai
2. Susan T. Fiske
3. Gandalf Nicolas

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Vasileios Davvetas
2. Adamantios Diamantopoulos

Citations in the corpus

• Comprehensive stereotype content dictionaries using a semi‐automated method (2020, methodology): “In the main text we present only the direction results, and in the Supplement, we include results including prevalence, as well as a comparison with the previously introduced Communion and Agency dictionaries (Pietraszkiewicz et al., 2018).”