Phylogeny of the holometabolous insect orders: molecular evidence

By Michael Whiting. 2002

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/839aa534d3322e7a84f98acefe2f7c5a7a3771de

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Michael Whiting
2. R. Beutel
3. A. Newton
4. S. Cameron
5. D. Mckenna
6. M. Thayer
7. S. Winterton
8. B. Wiegmann

Citations in the corpus

• Mecoptera is paraphyletic: multiple genes and phylogeny of Mecoptera and Siphonaptera (2002, methodology): “Each of these regions was considered an alignment block, and the blocks were assembled into a single matrix by scoring the taxa outside the block with missing values, as described elsewhere (see Whiting 2001, 2002).”
• The beetle tree of life reveals that Coleoptera survived end‐Permian mass extinction to diversify during the Cretaceous terrestrial revolution (2015, methodology): “2b (Whiting, 2002) and rd7b1 (Whiting, 2002) were used for amplification and/or sequencing when the aforementioned primers failed.”
• On wings of lace: phylogeny and Bayesian divergence time estimates of Neuropterida (Insecta) based on morphological and molecular data (2010, methodology): “This more traditional arrangement, with a monophyletic Megaloptera sister to Raphidioptera, was supported previously also by molecular and morphological data in Whiting et al. (1997) and Whiting (2002).”
• Phylogeny and Classification of Hymenoptera (2007, unknown): “in Kristensen (1999), and Whiting (2003). The first molecular studies are reviewed by Whiting et al.”
• The impact of rRNA secondary structure consideration in alignment and tree reconstruction: simulated data and a case study on the phylogeny of hexapods. (2010, result): “The latter hypothesis is congruent to recent views onmecopteroid relationships (Whiting et al. 1997; Bilinski et al. 1998; Bilinski and Buening 1998; Buening 1998; Whiting 2002b, 2002a; Beutel and Pohl 2006a).”
• A mitochondrial genome phylogeny of the Neuropterida (lace‐wings, alderflies and snakeflies) and their relationship to the other holometabolous insect orders (2009, methodology): “Eleven orders are traditionally recognized within Holometabola, and there is strong evidence from both morphological and molecular data sets for the monophyly of nine of these (Whiting 2002a).”
• The evolutionary history of Trichoptera (Insecta): A case of successful adaptation to life in freshwater (2013, background): “The aquatic Trichoptera and the terrestrial Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) together constitute the superorder Amphiesmenoptera, a sister group relationship well supported by both morphological and molecular data (Kristensen, 1999; Whiting, 2002; Beutel et al ., 2011).”
• The Systematics of the Hemiptera (2008, unknown): “2001; Paraneoptera paraphyletic with Psocodea as basal-most Neoptera and Polyneoptera as sister group of Heteropterodea + Auchenorrhyncha: Whiting 2002; Psocodea paraphyletic respect to Thysanoptera: Kjer et al. 2006).”