Poverty, Development, And Biodiversity Conservation: Shooting in the Dark?
By Arun Agrawal, K. Redford. 2016
286 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/83317a7b9c0f5e90fbb7196c0f99f7624288d838
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Ecological, economic and social perspectives on cocoa production worldwide (2007, background): “‘‘Only through additional systematic investigation will we come to know which aspects of biodiversity can co-prosper with alleviation of different aspects of poverty’’ (Agrawal and Redford 2006, p.32).”
- Hard choices: Making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being (2011, background): “While the loss of global biodiversity is well documented, there is considerable debate within the conservation field about how to respond most effectively (Wells and McShane, 2004; Agrawal and Redford, 2006; Brockington et al., 2006; Wilkie et al. 2006; Roe 2008). ll rights reserved.”
- Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management (2016, unknown): “…of species or quality of habitats) (Christie 2005; Daw et al. 2011; Leleu et al. 2012), or may not be used to determine attribution or causal influence of conservation (e.g., effect of a protected area on local levels of poverty [Agrawal & Redford 2006; Ferraro 2008; Ferraro & Hanauer 2014]).”
- Win-win REDD+ approaches belie carbon-biodiversity trade-offs (2012, background): “…of considerable debate (see McShane et al., 2011; Hirsch et al., 2010; for debates surrounding the win–win examples above, see Adams et al. 2006; Agrawal and Redford, 2006; Bowles et al., 1998; Garcia-Fernandez et al., 2008; Matson and Vitousek, 2006; Redford and Adams, 2009; Robinson and…”
- An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development (2008, background): “For example, in the most thorough systematic review we know of regarding conservation projects, researchers were stymied by the lack of metrics of success for either conservation or poverty alleviation (5).”