Effect of microencapsulation on viability and other characteristics in Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121

By Se Jin Kim, S. Cho, Sae-Hun Kim, O. Song, I. Shin, D. Cha, H. Park. 2008

235 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Screening for potential new probiotic based on probiotic properties and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity (2014, methodology): “The adhesive ability of the strains was examined using Caco-2 cells (Bustos et al., 2012; Kim et al., 2008) with minor modifications.”
Chitosan Coating Applications in Probiotic Microencapsulation (2019, background): “Therefore, their efficiency is highly correlated with their quantity and their viability during storage and product shelf-life [28,29].”
Protection of Bifidobacterium lactis and Lactobacillus acidophilus by microencapsulation using spray-chilling (2012, background): “L. acidophilus that were encapsulated in sodium alginate were more resistant than the free cells when they were submitted to in vitro tests that simulated gastric and intestinal conditions (Kim et al., 2008; Mokarram, Mortazavi, Habibi Najafi, & Shahidi, 2009; Sabikhi et al., 2010).”
Microencapsulation of probiotics for gastrointestinal delivery. (2012, unknown): “2 Kim et al[76]”
Co- encapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus with inulin or polydextrose in solid lipid microparticles provides protection and improves stability (2013, background): “acidophilus than for free cells when they were exposed to simulated gastric and intestinal solutions (Favaro-Trindade & Grosso, 2002; Kim et al., 2008; Sabikhi, Babu, Thompkinson, & Kapila, 2010).”