Speed-of-Processing and Driving Simulator Training Result in Improved Driving Performance
By D. Roenker, Gayla M. Cissell, Karlene K. Ball, V. Wadley, J. Edwards. Hum. Factors, 2003
506 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/83286fafb86582a75417c52b58817248e17fbcec
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Do “Brain-Training” Programs Work? (2016, methodology): “And training on a speed-of-processing task (the UFOV) led to improved performance on the UFOV (Roenker et al., 2003; Vance et al., 2007) or on a measure of choice response time (Roenker et al.”
- Computerized Cognitive Training with Older Adults: A Systematic Review (2012, background): “28 [34] with a median effect size of 1.”
- The Accelerate Study: The Longitudinal Effect of Speed of Processing Training on Cognitive Performance of Older Adults (2007, background): “Unlike in the prior study (Roenker et al., 2003), these participants were not selected for training on the basis of evidence of speed of processing impairment.”
- Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults. (2006, unknown): “Speed of processing training involved visual search and divided attention (identifying an object on a computer screen at increasingly brief exposures followed by dividing attention between 2 search tasks).(16,22,23) Each training intervention was 10 sessions.”