Acquisition of English Number Marking: The Singular-Plural Distinction
By Sid Kouider, Justin Halberda, Justin N. Wood, Susan Carey. 2006
181 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/831d6f154446a0a934a0e944f5041532aeb504c0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science?: a critical review. (2005, background): “of their language: English-learning infants distinguish singular from plural, for example, by 20 months of age ( Kouider, Halberda, Wood & Carey, in press ).”
- Dependent plurals and plural meaning (2008, background): “Singular DPs were discussed, revealing that not only do quantified singulars fail to give rise to dependent readings, but that singulars can act as interveners, blocking (25)A somewhat different result was achieved in a preferential looking study by Kouider et al. (2006), where children were shown t”
- One, two, three, four, nothing more: an investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles. (2007, unknown): “Recent studies suggest that nonhuman primates and infants under the age of 2 command the resources of setbased quantiWcation, at least at the level of the singular/plural distinction (Barner, Thalwitz, Wood, & Carey, in press, Barner Kouider, Harlberda, Wood, & Carey, under review, Kouider et al., ”
- Number-neutral bare plurals and the multiplicity implicature (2009, background): “This, indeed, is not a new idea; the theory of implicature proposed in Landman (2000), which in many ways is a direct precursor to Chierchia’s theory, crucially relies on implicatures being calculated at this point.”