The interplay of root, suffix and whole-word frequency in processing derived words

By C. Burani, A. Thornton. 2003

76 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/82ddec7f5019d4cca5201b561a69152bc8908a1e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. R. Harald Baayen
2. Victor Kuperman
3. R. Bertram
4. Saif M. Mohammad
5. Petar Milin
6. Jalal Al-Tamimi
7. Sali A. Tagliamonte

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Victor Kuperman
2. R. Bertram
3. R. Harald Baayen
4. Harald Baayen
5. Roger Levy
6. Petar Milin

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Victor Kuperman
2. R. Harald Baayen
3. R. Bertram
4. Saif M. Mohammad

Citations in the corpus

• Processing trade-offs in the reading of Dutch derived words (2010, methodology): “…lexical decision and naming latencies for English suffixed words with relatively productive suffixes, that is, suffixes occurring in a larger number of word types (see, however, Burani & Thornton (2003) for a null effect of suffix frequency, the number of word tokens in which a suffix occurs).”
• Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds (2011, background): “Other studies have found a processing advantage for complex words relative to monomorphemic words (Bertram et al., 1999; Burani & Thornton, 2003; Hudson & Buijs, 1995).”