Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): An Investigation of Their Implicit Gender Stereotypes and Stereotypes’ Connectedness to Math Performance

By A. Smeding. Sex Roles, 2012

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Factors that contribute to the underrepresentation of women in science careers worldwide: a literature review (2020, unknown): “2002; VanLeuvan 2004; Eccles 1987 cited by Smeding 2012; Steele 1997; Deboer 1986).”
How Gender and Race Stereotypes Impact the Advancement of Scholars in STEM: Professors’ Biased Evaluations of Physics and Biology Post-Doctoral Candidates (2020, background): “Women are also specifically stereotyped as being less competent thanmen in STEM fields (Smeding 2012; Spencer et al. 1999).”
Two brief interventions to mitigate a “chilly climate” transform women’s experience, relationships, and achievement in engineering. (2014, background): “Past research has shown that women tend to exhibit more positive implicit norms (Yoshida et al., 2012) and gender stereotypes (Nosek & Smyth, 2011; Smeding, 2012) than men in STEM.”