The impact of catch-and-release angling on short-term behaviour and habitat choice of northern pike (Esox lucius L.)

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Physiological and behavioural consequences of catch-and-release angling on northern pike (Esox lucius L.) (2009, unknown): “This method has proved to generate acceptable location data because pike can be approached within about 2 m before eliciting a flight response (Kobler et al., 2008b; Klefoth et al., 2008).”
Recovery bags reduce post-release impairments in locomotory activity and behavior of bonefish (Albula spp.) following exposure to angling-related stressors☆ (2013, background): “Previous studies have shown that angled northern pike (Esox lucius) also rest in refuge habitats after release, and experience little short-term mortality (Klefoth et al., 2008; Arlinghaus et al., 2009).”
Enhancing catch‐and‐release science with biotelemetry (2008, methodology): “Similar descriptive behavioural studies have been conducted on various freshwater species (Young and Isley 2004; Thompson 2007; Klefoth et al. 2008).”
Passive gear‐induced timidity syndrome in wild fish populations and its potential ecological and managerial implications (2017, unknown): “A prime example are catchand-release fisheries where fish become harder to catch as they increase their use of refuges and reduce their use of the open-water column (Yoneyama et al. 1996; Young and Hayes 2004; Askey et al. 2006; Klefoth et al. 2008, 2011, 2012; Baktoft et al. 2013).”