“Targeted” Advertising and Voter Turnout: An Experimental Study of the 2000 Presidential Election
By Joshua D. Clinton, J. Lapinski. Journal of Politics, 2004
120 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/82bda6b1ade67ed4fd59567ef4c958c059c11db3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
- Donald P. Green
- A. Gerber
- Jake Bowers
- Ben B. Hansen
- D. Shaw
- J. Gimpel
- James H. Fowler
- Christopher B. Mann
Citations in the corpus
- Why do People Vote? A Psychological Analysis of the Causes of Voter Turnout (2008, unknown): “…embedded in surveys of nationally representative samples of adults and more detailed correlational studies of real elections failed to turn up any evidence that negative ads discourage turnout (Clinton & Lapinski, 2004; Freedman & Goldstein, 1999; see also Lau, Sigelman, Heldman, & Babbitt, 1999).”
- How Large and Long-lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment (2011, methodology): “Clinton and Lapinski (2004) use a Web-TV panel survey to study the effects of exposure to a presidential ad.”
- Attributing Effects to a Cluster-Randomized Get-Out-the-Vote Campaign (2009, background): “(Michelson 2003; Smith, Gerber, and Orlich 2003; Clinton and Lapinski 2004; Arceneaux 2005; McNulty 2005; Wong 2005; Nickerson 2006; Nickerson, Friedrichs, and King 2006; Niven 2006).”