Solid‐Solution Phase Formation Rules for Multi‐component Alloys
By Y. Zhang, Y. J. Zhou, J. P. Lin, G. L. Chen, P. K. Liaw. 2008
2,981 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/828b6594f36d3c3817b60a2710f25080c4bab628
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Materials Chemistry
In Mechanical Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Microstructure of a near-equimolar refractory high-entropy alloy (2014, background): “Yet, the rules governing the formation of these solid solution phases are unclear, even if empiric parameters derived from the Hume and Rothery rules and depending on size effects and chemical compatibility appear to be fairly effective to predict the formation of the HEAs [2,3].”
- Phase stability of non-equiatomic CoCrFeMnNi high entropy alloys (2015, methodology): “empirical rules [19–26], or ab initio based methods [27,28]), the CALPHAD method provides an optimal balance between efficiency and accuracy.”
- “Self-sharpening” tungsten high-entropy alloy (2020, background): “Among them, atomic size difference d [35], the ratio of entropy to enthalpyV [36], and valence electron concentration (VEC) [37] are three typical parameters to determine the phase stability for BCC or FCC solid solutions.”
- Strong grain-size effect on deformation twinning of an Al0.1CoCrFeNi high-entropy alloy (2017, background): “high configurational entropy of random solid solution states [1,3,6].”