Sampling Bee Communities (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) in a Desert Landscape: Are Pan Traps Sufficient?

By Joseph S. Wilson, T. Griswold, O. Messinger. 2008

231 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/826f80f730ae46daf27bc0788aae86f9c1d14f9a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Insect Science

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

The relative performance of sampling methods for native bees: an empirical test and review of the literature (2020, methodology): “A recent review of the efficacy of different sampling methods was focused on tropical forest agroecosystems (Prado et al. 2017), and almost all other empirical studies explicitly comparing sampling methods have been restricted to natural or agricultural ecosystems in the Northern Hemisphere (Wilson ”
Assessing bee species richness in two Mediterranean communities: importance of habitat type and sampling techniques (2011, background): “For instance, several methods might be included for comprehensive inventories aiming at detecting as many species as possible, while a single method may suffice to obtain a relative and comparable measure of species richness through time and across sites (Westphal et al. 2008; Wilson et al. 2008).”
Effectiveness of Bowl Trapping and Netting for Inventory of a Bee Community (2011, background): “For example, Wilson et al. (2008) found that Perdita were predominantly collected in bowl traps and Colletes were mainly detected by netting in the Great Basin Desert of western Utah.”
Spatial patterns of bee captures in North American bowl trapping surveys (2010, methodology): “, 2008), and have estimated the efficacy of different collection methods (Jacob-Remacle, 1984; Noyes, 1989; Riemann, 1995; Banaszak & Krzysztofiak, 1996; Cane et al., 2000; Monsevièius, 2004; Bartholomew & Prowell, 2005; Giles & Ascher, 2006;Wells &Decker, 2006; Campbell &Hanula, 2007; Roulston et a”
Factors affecting bee communities in forest openings and adjacent mature forest (2017, background): “There is also concern that bowl traps are potentially biased as a function of floral abundance, collecting fewer bees when resources are plentiful (Baum andWallen, 2011; Wilson et al., 2008).”