Spatial patterns of bee captures in North American bowl trapping surveys

By S. Droege, V. Tepedino, Gretchen LeBuhn, W. Link, R. Minckley, Qian Chen, C. Conrad. 2010

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2940072276e0a0fe119dbdd7f810dbe06c06bd6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Robert P. Jean
2. April L. Hamblin
3. N. Pavlovic
4. S. Frank
5. E. Youngsteadt
6. Krystalynn J. Frohnapple
7. R. Grundel
8. S. Wratten

In Genetics

1. April L. Hamblin
2. S. Frank
3. E. Youngsteadt

In Insect Science

1. S. Frank
2. S. Wratten

Citations in the corpus

• Wild bee abundance declines with urban warming, regardless of floral density (2018, methodology): “We placed pan traps 5 m from each other and from floral resources in two X-shaped patterns, varying the pattern as needed to fit the site (Droege et al. 2010).”
• Effectiveness of Bowl Trapping and Netting for Inventory of a Bee Community (2011, background): “Bowl trap color (Toler et al. 2005) and trap placement within study plots (Tuell and Isaacs 2009, Droege et al. 2010) affect which, and how many, bees are collected in a survey.”