Interdependence, Government Constraints, and Economic Voting
By Timothy Hellwig. Journal of Politics, 2001
189 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/823eeb75a922ebc6231fdc4167c7be1e4ebbfb33
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
- S. Hobolt
- Susan Banducci
- James Tilley
- Christopher Wlezien
- Timothy Hellwig
- Mark A. Kayser
- C. Anderson
- David J. Samuels
Citations in the corpus
- Performance pressure: Patterns of partisanship and the economic vote (2011, background): “Duch and Stevenson (2008) find a diminishing economic vote; Hellwig (2001) argues that voters hold governments less accountable for economic variation that is beyond their control in a globalising economy.27 Still others (e.g., Anderson 1995) argue that greater governmental involvement in the…”
- Voting in Open Economies (2007, background): “Hellwig (2001) asserts that trade openness upsets the traditional connections between voters and elected policy makers in closed economies.”
- Clarity of responsibility: How government cohesion conditions performance voting (2013, background): “Moreover, the focus on economic voting for assessing electoral accountability may also be problematic in an increasingly globalised world where government control over the economy is constrained by exogenous factors to varying degrees (Hellwig 2001, 2010).”
- The End of Economic Voting? Contingency Dilemmas and the Limits of Democratic Accountability (2007, background): “Yet, as several decades of research have revealed, 1To keep this topic manageable, I focus on democratic elections in the developed countries, and I focus on the domestic political economy (unlike Hellwig 2001, for example).”