Mitigation potential and global health impacts from emissions pricing of food commodities

By M. Springmann, D. Mason-D’Croz, Sherman Robinson, K. Wiebe, H. Charles, J. Godfray, M. Rayner, P. Scarborough. 2017

287 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/820612f1d582459689159bf24c6c31a76538db78

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. S. Wynes
2. Kimberly A. Nicholas
3. J. Fanzo

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. S. Wynes
2. Kimberly A. Nicholas

Citations in the corpus

• Demand-side solutions to climate change mitigation consistent with high levels of well-being (2021, unknown): “A combined assessment of mitigation effect and wellbeing suggests that in the food sector, shifting to plant-based diets is a main option in the developed world: it delivers potentially 40% or even more reduction of GHG emissions, while reducing global mortality by 6–10%, equaling health co-benefits”
• Healthy and Sustainable Diets and Food Systems: the Key to Achieving Sustainable Development Goal 2? (2019, background): “Additionally, such diets have negative impacts on cardiovascular disease, stroke, and diabetes (Mozaffarian 2016; Springmann et al. 2017).”
• A multi-model assessment of food security implications of climate change mitigation (2019, unknown): “Environmental science & 747 technology 2012, 46(11): 5672-5679.”
• The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions (2018, background): “Shifts in public policy, such as a carbon tax on food commodities (Springmann et al 2016) or encouraging compact urban growth (Hankey and Marshall 2010), can address these barriers.”
• Reply to Second comment on ‘The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions’ (2017, background): “Shifts in public policy, such as a carbon tax on food commodities (Springmann et al 2016) or encouraging compact urban growth (Hankey and Marshall 2010), can address these barriers.”