A spatially explicit height–diameter model for Scots pine in Estonia

By Matthias Schmidt, Andres Kiviste, Klaus von Gadow. European Journal of Forest Research, 2011

69 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This contribution presents an approach to model individual tree height–diameter relationships for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) in multi-size and mixed-species stands in Estonia using the Estonian Permanent Forest Research Plot Network. The dataset includes 22,347 trees. The main focus of the study was to use an approach that is spatially explicit allowing for high accuracy prediction from a minimum set of predictor variables that can be easily derived. Consequently, the height–diameter relationship is modeled as a function of only the stand quadratic mean diameter (dg) and the plot geographical coordinates. A specific generalized additive model gam is employed that allows for the integration of a varying coefficient term and 2-dimensional surface estimators representing a spatial trend and a spatially varying coefficient term. The high flexibility of the model is needed due to the very few predictor variables that subsume a variety of potential influential factors. Subsequently, a linear mixed model is used that quantifies the random variation between plots and between measurement occasions within plots, respectively. Hence, our model is based on the theory of structured additive regression models (Fahrmeir et al. 2007) and separates a structured (correlated) spatial effect from an unstructured (uncorrelated) spatial effect. Additionally, the linear mixed model allows for calibration of the model using height measurements as pre-information. Model bias is small, despite the somewhat irregular distribution of experimental areas within the country. The overall model shows some similarity with earlier applications in Finland. However, there are important differences involving the model form, the predictors and the method of parameter estimation.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/819eeb6521b11d03d5d4d16dde0f8f2d58ae124e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

  1. Hailemariam Temesgen
  2. C. Zhang
  3. Xiangdong Lei
  4. Hao Zang
  5. Xiu-hai Zhao
  6. Weisheng Zeng

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

  1. Hailemariam Temesgen
  2. C. Zhang
  3. Xiangdong Lei
  4. Hao Zang
  5. Xiu-hai Zhao
  6. Weisheng Zeng

Citations in the corpus