Modelling tree height–diameter relationships in multi-species and multi-layered forests: A large observational study from Northeast China

85 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Allometric equations for estimating tree aboveground biomass in evergreen broadleaf forests of Viet Nam (2016, methodology): “Validation statistics were computed for each realization of randomly selected data and then averaged over the 200 realizations (Temesgen et al., 2014).”
Height–diameter equations for larch plantations in northern and northeastern China: a comparison of the mixed-effects, quantile regression and generalized additive models (2016, background): “…(Curtis, 1967; Lappi, 1997), quadratic mean diameter (Sharma and Parton, 2007; Schmidt et al., 2011), number of trees (Staudhammer and LeMay, 2000; Temesgen et al., 2014), basal area (Staudhammer and LeMay, 2000; Temesgen et al., 2014), the median diameter of basal area weighted diameter…”
Using quadratic mean diameter and relative spacing index to enhance height-diameter and crown ratio models fitted to longitudinal data (2016, methodology): “Temesgen et al. (2005, 2007, 2008, 2014) suggested that distance-independent variables including BAL and CCFL also improve fits for tree height–d.b.h. and crown relationships.”