Transitioning policy: co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the Netherlands

By René Kemp, Jan Rotmans. 2009

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management Science and Operations Research, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80f104c0c00de5fa61b06dcc6c55c1bcfbd24705

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. C. Leeuwis
2. Erik Laes
3. F. Nevens
4. L. Gorissen
5. L. Klerkx

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. C. Leeuwis
2. Erik Laes
3. H. Jochemsen
4. M. Schut
5. F. Nevens
6. S. Wigboldus
7. L. Gorissen
8. L. Klerkx

In Political Science and International Relations

1. C. Leeuwis
2. Erik Laes
3. F. Nevens
4. L. Gorissen
5. L. Klerkx

Citations in the corpus

• A Comparison of Energy Transition Governance in Germany, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom (2014, methodology): “According to Kemp and Rotmans ([38], pp.”
• Systemic perspectives on scaling agricultural innovations. A review (2016, background): “Approaches relating to the study of transitions to sustainability (Elzen et al. 2012; Geels 2002; Hinrichs 2014; Horlings and Marsden 2011; Kemp et al. 1998; Kemp and Rotmans 2009; Rotmans 2003), however, already include perspectives on scaling.”