Process Tomography of Quantum Memory in a Josephson Phase Qubit
By Matthew Neeley. 2008
229 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80bc755cbb33e65ae332bddfa62f8394017316e3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Citations in the corpus
- Atomic physics and quantum optics using superconducting circuits (2011, methodology): “Also, quantum process tomography was experimentally implemented on single [65] and two [66] phase qubits.”
- Quantum process tomography of a universal entangling gate implemented with Josephson phase qubits (2009, unknown): “This is the first solid-state demonstration of QPT in a two-qubit system, as QPT has previously been demonstrated only with single solid-state qubit”
- 1 / f noise: Implications for solid-state quantum information (2013, background): “In (Neeley et al., 2008) the first quantum memory operation on a TLS in a phase qubit has been demonstrated.”
- Ion-trap measurements of electric-field noise near surfaces (2014, background): “…been performed with superconducting qubits, where TLFs in the insulating layer of a Josephson junction have been spectroscopically resolved (Martinis et al., 2005) and the coherent manipulation of individual two-level defects has been demonstrated (Neeley et al., 2008; Lisenfeld et al., 2010).”
- Hybrid quantum circuits: Superconducting circuits interacting with other quantum systems (2012, background): “Generally, TLSs are regarded as a nuisance because they cause decoherence (Ku and Yu, 2005; Martin et al., 2005).”