Anthropogenic debris in seafood: Plastic debris and fibers from textiles in fish and bivalves sold for human consumption

By Chelsea M. Rochman, A. Tahir, Susan L. Williams, D. Baxa, Rosalyn Lam, Jeffrey T. Miller, Foo-ching Teh, S. Werorilangi, S. Teh. Scientific Reports, 2015

1,325 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The ubiquity of anthropogenic debris in hundreds of species of wildlife and the toxicity of chemicals associated with it has begun to raise concerns regarding the presence of anthropogenic debris in seafood. We assessed the presence of anthropogenic debris in fishes and shellfish on sale for human consumption. We sampled from markets in Makassar, Indonesia and from California, USA. All fish and shellfish were identified to species where possible. Anthropogenic debris was extracted from the digestive tracts of fish and whole shellfish using a 10% KOH solution and quantified under a dissecting microscope. In Indonesia, anthropogenic debris was found in 28% of individual fish and in 55% of all species. Similarly, in the USA, anthropogenic debris was found in 25% of individual fish and in 67% of all species. Anthropogenic debris was also found in 33% of individual shellfish sampled. All of the anthropogenic debris recovered from fish in Indonesia was plastic, whereas anthropogenic debris recovered from fish in the USA was primarily fibers. Variations in debris types likely reflect different sources and waste management strategies between countries. We report some of the first findings of plastic debris in fishes directly sold for human consumption raising concerns regarding human health.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Pollution

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80b4153b8d23f614a305bc2c0a3debe4361b9fa4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

1. Richard C. Thompson
2. Frank J. Kelly

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

1. A. Lusher
2. Huahong Shi
3. P. Lindeque
4. Dongqi Yang
5. L. Su
6. Richard C. Thompson
7. P. Hollman
8. P. Ross

In Pollution

1. A. Lusher
2. L. Hoogenboom
3. P. Lindeque
4. Richard C. Thompson
5. Huahong Shi
6. L. Su
7. Dongqi Yang
8. T. Galloway

Citations in the corpus

• Microplastics in fisheries and aquaculture (2017, background): “These species are chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus), Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus), Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus), Japanese anchovy (Engraulis japonicus), Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua), European pilchard (Sardina pilchardus), blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou), European sprat (Sprattu”
• Microplastic ingestion and diet composition of planktivorous fish (2020, background): “Most colored fibers were made of cellulose (cotton), semisynthetic cellulose (rayon), and polyethylene terephthalate (polyester), from textiles and entering marine environment via wastewater treatment (Browne et al. 2011; Rochman et al. 2015).”
• Understanding How Microplastics Affect Marine Biota on the Cellular Level Is Important for Assessing Ecosystem Function: A Review (2019, background): “Research into the abundance of plastics in food has focused on seafood caught or cultured for human consumption (Van Cauwenberghe and Janssen 2014; Rochman et al. 2015; Naji et al. 2018).”
• Contributions of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy in microplastic pollution research: A review (2020, background): “…damage and/or death (Lei et al., 2018), (4) Oxidative stress (Yu et al., 2018), (5) neurotoxicity (Barboza et al., 2018), (6) immune system responses (Avio et al., 2015), (7) changes in gene expression (Rochman et al., 2014, 2015), and (8) energy deficiency (Rodriguez-Seijo, 2018).”
• Occurrence and effects of plastic additives on marine environments and organisms: A review. (2017, background): “…by organisms from higher trophic levels such as fish (Boerger et al., 2010; Carpenter et al., 1972; Dantas et al., 2012; Foekema et al., 2013; Lusher et al., 2013; Neves et al., 2015; Possatto et al., 2011; Rochman et al., 2015) and marine mammals (Eriksson and Burton, 2003; Lusher et al., 2015).”
• Microplastic pollution is widely detected in US municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent. (2016, methodology): “…identification, such as that employed here, for microplastic identification (Bond et al., 2014; Lavers et al., 2014; Devriese et al., 2015; Rochman et al., 2015a; Romeo et al., 2015; Fossia et al., 2016; Hammer et al., 2016; Miranda and CarvalhoSouza, 2016; Nicolau et al., 2016; Peters…”
• Solutions to microplastic pollution - Removal of microplastics from wastewater effluent with advanced wastewater treatment technologies. (2017, background): “It has been proposed that if MPs with their micropollutants 36 enter food webs through digestion by biota, this may le d to ecosystem and human health impacts 37 (Browne et al. 2013, Rochman et al. 2015, Miranda and de Carvalho-Souza 2016).”
• Microplastic fragments and microbeads in digestive tracts of planktivorous fish from urban coastal waters (2016, neutral): “The frequency of occurrence of plastics in the digestive tract of Japanese anchovy, at 77%, is one of the highest recorded in fishes 22,24 .”