The Market Valuation of Environmental Capital Expenditures by Pulp and Paper Companies
By Peter M. Clarkson, Yue Li, Gordon Richardson. 2000
520 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/809cdfab9db3a42ddf6ca84041f6cf707b5c8dd6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Diogenis Baboukardos
- Elisabeth Albertini
- Charles H. Cho
- Michel Magnan
- Yue Li
- Gordon Richardson
- Peter M. Clarkson
- Michelle Rodrigue
In Marketing
- Carmelo Reverte
- Charles H. Cho
- Dennis M. Patten
- Elisabeth Albertini
- Michel Magnan
- Michelle Rodrigue
- Gordon Richardson
- M. Freedman
In Strategy and Management
- Carmelo Reverte
- Charles H. Cho
- Dennis M. Patten
- Elisabeth Albertini
- Michel Magnan
- Diogenis Baboukardos
- Michelle Rodrigue
- Gordon Richardson
Citations in the corpus
- Revisiting the Relation Between Environmental Performance and Environmental Disclosure: An Empirical Analysis (2008, background): “Similar relative performance measures are also used in Clarkson et al. (2004).”
- Market valuation of greenhouse gas emissions under a mandatory reporting regime: Evidence from the UK (2017, background): “…associated with its market value, Hughes (2000) shows that sulfur dioxide missions are negatively associated with firms’ market valuation, and Clarkson et al. (2004) find that firms with high levels f toxic releases suffer a larger penalty in terms of their market capitalization than firms…”
- Disclosure effects, carbon emissions and corporate value (2014, background): “For example, capital investment is often associated with incremental corporate value (Clarkson et al., 2004), and eco-efficient and proactive environmental strategies and activities have been fou d to lead to higher profitability and greater corporate value (King and Lenox, 2002; Burnett and…”
- The international integrated reporting framework : key issues and future research opportunities (2014, background): “While this additional information has been shown to be value-relevant (Clarkson et al. 2004; Dhaliwal et al. 2011, 2012) the extent of reported nonfinancial information included in such reports is often overwhelming in quantity, with sustainability reports reaching up to 200 pages in length (KPMG…”
- The Valuation Relevance of Greenhouse Gas Emissions under the European Union Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme (2015, methodology): “In detail, first, absent a measure designed to capture a firm’s general environmental performance, it is possible that the coefficients on our various carbon emissions measures may simply be capturing unbooked environmental liabilities on other dimensions of corporate environmental performance (e.g.”
- Does it Really Pay to Be Green? Determinants and Consequences of Proactive Environmental Strategies (2011, unknown): “In addition, actual emission data in one single period can be difficult to interpret outside the industry context and it is well known that emission data evolve over time as industry wide environmental performance improves (Clarkson et al 2004).”