New directions on agile methods: a comparative analysis

By Pekka Abrahamsson, Juhani Warsta, Mikko T. Siponen, Jussi Ronkainen. 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings., 2003

755 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Software

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8099f60e58a2a45f0152eb1ec78a77a29cacc0bd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

1. Torgeir Dingsøyr
2. Brian Fitzgerald
3. Tore Dybå
4. James Noble
5. Stuart Marshall
6. Rashina Hoda
7. Kieran Conboy
8. Gerard Hartnett

In Software

1. Torgeir Dingsøyr
2. Brian Fitzgerald
3. Tore Dybå
4. Kieran Conboy
5. Gerard Hartnett

Citations in the corpus

• Self-Organizing Roles on Agile Software Development Teams (2013, background): “Most XP practices are focused around development activities at the team level: in contrast, Scrum focuses more on project management [31], [32].”
• Customising agile methods to software practices at Intel Shannon (2006, methodology): “Also, the meta-method process suggests new software development roles – a method engineer, for example – and this may not be welcome in many organisations.”
• Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review (2008, methodology): “The report was followed by a comparative analysis of nine agile methods in 2003 [3], where it is stated that empirical support for the suggested methods remains scarce.”