Beyond Comprehension

264 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The power of representation and interpretation: Doubling statistical reasoning performance with icons and frequentist interpretations of ambiguous numbers (2014, background): “…work with different numerical formats and different visual aids is still a matter of some disagreement (Chapman & Liu, 2009; Hill & Brase, 2012; Peters, 2012), as is the issue of how best to measure the construct of numerical literacy (Cokely, Galesic, Schulz, Ghazal, & Garcia-Retamero, 2012).”
Predicting biases in very highly educated samples: Numeracy and metacognition (2014, background): “…deep elaborative processing, Cokely & Kelley, 2009; Cokely et al., 2012); (2) affective numerical intuition (e.g., precise symbolic number mapping, Peters, 2012; Peters et al., 2006); and (3) meaningful intuitive understanding (e.g., gist-based representation and reasoning; Reyna, 2004, 2012;…”
Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test (2016, background): “Sinayev and Peters (2015) explain nicely how threecategory coding can be used to begin to tease apart the contributions of both cognitive reflection and numeracy to the CRT.”