Water Manganese Exposure and Children’s Intellectual Function in Araihazar, Bangladesh

By G. Wasserman, Xinhua Liu, F. Parvez, H. Ahsan, Diane Levy, P. Factor-Litvak, J. Kline, A. van Geen, V. Slavkovich, N. LoIacono and 3 more. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2004

981 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Exposure to manganese via inhalation has long been known to elicit neurotoxicity in adults, but little is known about possible consequences of exposure via drinking water. In this study, we report results of a cross-sectional investigation of intellectual function in 142 10-year-old children in Araihazar, Bangladesh, who had been consuming tube-well water with an average concentration of 793 μg Mn/L and 3 μg arsenic/L. Children and mothers came to our field clinic, where children received a medical examination in which weight, height, and head circumference were measured. Children’s intellectual function was assessed on tests drawn from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, version III, by summing weighted items across domains to create Verbal, Performance, and Full-Scale raw scores. Children provided urine specimens for measuring urinary As and creatinine and were asked to provide blood samples for measuring blood lead, As, Mn, and hemoglobin concentrations. After adjustment for sociodemographic covariates, water Mn was associated with reduced Full-Scale, Performance, and Verbal raw scores, in a dose–response fashion; the low level of As in water had no effect. In the United States, roughly 6% of domestic household wells have Mn concentrations that exceed 300 μg Mn/L, the current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency lifetime health advisory level. We conclude that in both Bangladesh and the United States, some children are at risk for Mn-induced neurotoxicity.

Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ff0d207a90edc40b2b94da0d5cd6700072309a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. M. Bouchard
  2. M. Hughes
  3. T. Bouffard
  4. M. F. Naujokas
  5. Marie-Ève Brodeur
  6. S. Sauvé
  7. B. D. Beck
  8. B. Anderson

Citations in the corpus