Indirect land use emissions in the life cycle of biofuels: regulations vs science

By A. Liska, R. Perrin. 2009

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Biomedical Engineering, Environmental Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7fba94987d14acb88a19fd7f45da2c3377b610e6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Agronomy and Crop Science

1. A. Strømman
2. F. Cherubini

In Biomedical Engineering

1. A. Strømman
2. F. Cherubini

In Environmental Engineering

1. Harry de Gorter
2. David R. Just
3. A. Strømman
4. F. Cherubini
5. David Zilberman

Citations in the corpus

• Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. (2011, background): “However, these models likely estimate GHG emissions from LUC with significant inaccuracy, and further research is needed before we can be reasonably sure of the indirect effects of biofuels (Liska and Perrin, 2009).”
• The Social Costs and Benefits of Biofuels: The Intersection of Environmental, Energy and Agricultural Policy (2010, background): “…U.S. practices would also threaten to become an issue, such as the fact that the sustainability standard is written to allow domestic producer compliance by grandfathering-in existing domestic producers who are not in compliance, but not existing foreign producers who 41See Liska and Perrin (2009).”