Extinction in a field of bullets: a search for causes in the decline of the world's freshwater fishes

By J. Duncan, Julie L. Lockwood. 2001

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7faf7631cac0decf0e23e27d7d8527cbcecff776

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Small fish, big fish, red fish, blue fish: size-biased extinction risk of the world's freshwater and marine fishes. (2007, background): “In contrast, linkages between fish body size and conservation status in freshwater ecosystems are less clear, owing to the fact that fish species are subjected to a greater range of threats (Angermeier, 1995; Duncan & Lockwood, 2001; Reynolds et al. , 2005b; Olden et al. , 2006).”
Fish fauna in Iberian Mediterranean river basins: biodiversity, introduced species and damming impacts (2004, unknown): “Freshwater fish are not only the most diverse group of vertebrates, they also feature the greatest proportion of threatened species (Bruton, 1995; Leidy and Moyle, 1998; Duncan and Lockwood, 2001).”
Crying wolf, crying foul, or crying shame: alien salmonids and a biodiversity crisis in the southern cool-temperate galaxioid fishes? (2006, background): “Interestingly, too, despite widespread and growing expressions of concern about the role of introduced species on threatened species, Duncan and Lockwood (2001) did not examine this question with relation to the conservation status of fish species.”
What are the best correlates of predicted extinction risk (2004, background): “Sixth, the influence of deterministic threats may overwhelm the influence of species intrinsic biological attributes (e.g. ecological specialization, late age of first reproduction, etc.) on their susceptibility to extinction (Duncan and Lockwood, 2001).”
Heads you win, tails you lose: Life‐history traits predict invasion and extinction risk of the world's freshwater fishes (2017, methodology): “The inclusion of species was determined by data availability based on six life‐history traits previously shown to be associated with fish invasion and extinction (Angermeier, 1995; Duncan & Lockwood, 2001; Marr et al., 2013; Olden et al., 2006; Reynolds et al., 2005).”
Mass extinctions and macroevolution (2005, background): “…et al. 2000; Aberhan and Baumiller 2003), an argument that may also explain the failure of intrinsic factors to predict extinction risk in the most heavily stressed elements of the modern biota, such as freshwater fishes and Australian marsupials (Duncan and Lockwood 2001; Fisher et al. 2003).”
Conservation status of imperiled north American freshwater and diadromous fishes (2008, background): “Among vertebrates, fishes have the most dynamic taxonomy (Duncan and Lockwood 2001), and Nelson (2006) concluded that the annual net increase in newly described species of fishes exceeds the combined number of new tetrapods.”
Fish life history, angler behaviour and optimal management of recreational fisheries (2013, background): “However, for freshwater fish species, the relationships between risk of decline and anthropogenic factors are often not clear-cut (Duncan and Lockwood 2001; Reynolds et al. 2005).”
ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES DRIVING BIOTIC HOMOGENIZATION: TESTING A MECHANISTIC MODEL USING FISH FAUNAS (2004, background): “…of the regional distinctiveness of fish faunas across the United States is the best quantitative documentation of biotic homogenization to date (e.g., Radomski and Goeman 1995, Rahel 2000, Duncan and Lockwood 2001b, Marchetti et al. 2001, Scott and Helfman 2001, reviewed by Rahel [2002]).”