What are the best correlates of predicted extinction risk

By J. O'Grady, D. H. Reed, Barry W. Brook, R. Frankham. 2004

296 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f902e550776619e9afe7f16a45a49c38dd3faf59

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Avian life‐history determinants of local extinction risk in a hyper‐fragmented neotropical forest landscape (2008, background): “Despite recent macroecological progress in our understanding of the relationship between sensitivity to anthropogenic disturbance and life-history traits on a global or continental scale (e.g. Purvis et al., 2000; Fagan et al., 2001; O’Grady et al., 2004), few studies have investigated these relatio”
Improving species distribution models: the value of data on abundance (2014, background): “2013), extinction risk (O’Grady et al. 2004) and community structure and function (Davey et al.”
Importance of the seed bank for population viability and population monitoring in a threatened wetland herb (2005, background): “com.). The narrow endemism of the plant seems to reflect its limitation to rare sites where competition with other species has been reduced by an unusual combination of stressful edaphic and hydrologic conditions (Knox, 1997; Knox et al., 1999) and by a self-incompatible breeding system ( Messmore a”
Climate warming and the rainforest birds of the Australian Wet Tropics : Using abundance data as a sensitive predictor of change in total population size (2005, unknown): “First, previous analyses were confined to endemic vertebrates that are predominantly restricted to cool upland environments ( Nix and Switzer, 1991 ).”
How to make a common species rare: A case against conservation complacency (2011, background): “There is also an extensive literature on the relationships between rarity, conservation status and the proneness of species to decline (Gaston, 1994; Koh et al., 2004; Lindenmayer and Fischer, 2006; O’Grady et al., 2004; reviewed by Gaston, 1994).”
Defining reintroduction success using IUCN criteria for threatened species: a demographic assessment (2015, background): “Whereas a small population size has been shown to be statistically related to extinction at the inter-taxon level (Mace & Kershaw, 1997; O’Grady et al., 2004), using it as an indicator of viability has several shortcomings (see, e.g. discussion in Flather et al., 2011, in the context of the debate…”
Assessing species vulnerability to climate and land use change: the case of the Swiss breeding birds (2014, background): “We did not extrapolate population trends into the future because of the large uncertainty involved and because population size is deemed to be correlated with range size (O’Grady et al., 2004) which is already captured by the indicator IAO.”
Conservation biogeography of freshwater fishes: recent progress and future challenges (2010, background): “Recent efforts have focused on endogenous (life history, dispersal and tolerance) traits that are repeatedly associated with high likelihood of extinction, with the goal of safeguarding the most vulnerable native species (O’Grady et al., 2004).”