INCOMPLETE SOCIAL CONTRACTS

By Philippe Aghion, Patrick Bolton. 2003

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

There is a long normative ‘Social Contract’ tradition that attempts to characterize ex-post income inequalities that are agreeable to all ‘behind a veil of ignorance.’ This paper takes a similar normative approach to characterize social decision-making procedures. It is shown that quite generally some form of majority-voting is preferred to unanimity ‘behind a veil of ignorance’ whenever society faces deadweight costs in making compensating transfers. Deviations from unanimity (or ex-post Pareto optimality) are ex-ante efficient to the extent that they economize on costly compensating transfers. Put another way, the optimal decision rule trades off the benefits of minority protection and those from greater flexibility. (JEL: H11, G33, G34, D63, P16, P48)

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7f89e101d73811cb6ec7ba2cd57e556c910f6ca1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. A. Alesina
  2. Guido Tabellini
  3. Philippe Aghion
  4. Francesco Trebbi
  5. Massimo Morelli
  6. Daron Acemoglu
  7. Elias Papaioannou
  8. Torsten Persson

In Gender Studies

  1. Philippe Aghion
  2. Guido Tabellini
  3. Francesco Trebbi
  4. A. Alesina
  5. Elvire Guillaud
  6. Claudia Senik
  7. Kenneth F. Scheve
  8. D. Stasavage

Citations in the corpus