Phonetic and Phonological Evidence for Intermediate Phrasing in Spanish Intonation

By Holly J. Nibert. 2000

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Effects of constituent length and syntactic branching on intonational phrasing in Ibero-Romance (2003, background): “Moreover, some studies have pointed out language-particular preferences in prosodic groupings [6-8].”
Intonational phrasing in Romance: The role of syntactic and prosodic structure (2004, unknown): “…insomnia problems’ b. [[La[h]amomilla]φ]Ip [[ [k]ome è noto]φ]Ip [[k]alma]φ [anche i bambini]φ [[h]on problemi]φ [di insonnia]φ]Ip More recently, a number of studies have pointed out language-particular preferences in prosodic groupings (Prieto 1997; Nibert 2000; Frota 2000; D’Imperio 2001, 2002).”
Intonational pitch accent distribution in Egyptian Arabic. (2006, background): “Norlin (1989) observed that after a focus pitch accents in EA were produced in compressed pitch range, but does not define the exact type of focus elicited in his study.”
Subjects, objects and intonational phrasing in spanish and portuguese* (2005, background): “For Spanish, there are two contradicting reports: on the one hand, Nibert (2000) concludes that the default type of phrasing in Spanish must be (SV)(O).”