Effects of constituent length and syntactic branching on intonational phrasing in Ibero-Romance

By Gorka Elordieta, Sónia Frota, P. Prieto, Marina Vigário. 2003

53 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8d65d815f6add8593cbc0219874c4720ab0189c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. M. D’Imperio
2. Gorka Elordieta
3. Sónia Frota
4. Marina Vigário
5. P. Prieto

Citations in the corpus

• Intonational phrasing in Romance: The role of syntactic and prosodic structure (2004, background): “…are the Standard variety spoken in Lisbon (SEP - for previous comparative work on intonational phrasing in SEP and other Romance languages see Elordieta et al. 2003, and Elordieta, Frota and Vigário 2003) and the Northern urban variety spoken in Braga (NEP - for previous comparative work on…”
• Subjects, objects and intonational phrasing in spanish and portuguese* (2005, background): “Nespor & Vogel 1986, Kanerva 1990, Schütze 1994, Rice 1987, Frascarelli 1997, 2000, among others). Nespor & Vogel (1986: 196–205) further suggest that there are syntactic conditions on restructuring of IPs. Basically, IP boundaries can only be inserted at the edges of DPs or CPs (NPs and S¢, in the ”