On the meta-analysis of response ratios for studies with correlated and multi-group designs.

314 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Accurately measuring willingness to pay for consumer goods: a meta-analysis of the hypothetical bias (2019, methodology): “The elements of Vi must be calculated according to the chosen ES measure (see Web Appendix B; Gleser and Olkin 2009; Lajeunesse 2011).”
Impacts of nitrogen addition on plant species richness and abundance: A global meta‐analysis (2018, methodology): “Because of non‐independence of the ef‐ fect sizes, we computed the variance–covariance matrix based on Lajeunesse (2011).”
A systematic review and meta-analysis of discrepancies between logged and self-reported digital media use (2021, methodology): “…measurement forms, given the within-subjects nature of the analysis and the existence of a true ratio scale with a natural zero point 106 , we calculated the log-transformed ratio of means 108,109 , and estimated the sampling variance accounting for the correlation between measurements 83 .”