Emissions Trading, Electricity Restructuring, and Investment in Pollution Abatement
By M. Fowlie. 2010
265 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7f4d2d21e6ebf45996743820e242c2b8bdc96f63
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Adam B. Jaffe
- T. Sterner
- Eun-Hee Kim
- Maximilian Willner
- C. Mitchell
- E. Somanathan
- Thomas P. Lyon
- Juan-Pablo Montero
Citations in the corpus
- Keep Your Clunker in the Suburb: Low Emission Zones and Adoption of Green Vehicles (2014, background): “Recently, several papers (Fowlie, 2010; Auffhammer and Kellogg, 2011) have shown that spatial (unintended) consequences can substantially change cost–benefit calculations of regulations on firms.”
- Defensive Investments and the Demand for Air Quality: Evidence from the NOx Budget Program (2017, unknown): “Economic research has found that the NBP led firms to install costly abatement technologies, and that regulated electricity generating units were especially likely to install highly effective “Selective Catalytic Reduction” abatement technology (Fowlie 2010).”
- Corporate Governance and Pollution Externalities of Public and Private Firms* (2020, unknown): “Can we expect costly prosocial actions from firms and their investors? Friedman (1970) argues that firms should focus on maximizing returns to shareholders, who can privately donate their wealth to causes of their choosing.”
- When Does Regulation Distort Costs? Lessons from Fuel Procurement in U.S. Electricity Generation (2015, unknown): “In recent work, Fowlie (2010) nds evidence consistent with the Averch-Johnson hypothesis in the context of compliance decisions for regional nitrogen oxide markets using a randomcoe cients logit model.”
- Procrastinating reform: The impact of the market stability reserve on the EU ETS (2016, background): “…emissions paths are its criteria to assess the above objectives, we believe one would be hard pressed to find more relevant ones.14 Here, we focus on uncertainty affecting the demand for allowances caused e.g. 13See e.g. Fischer & Preonas (2010); Fowlie (2010); Goulder (2013) and Böhringer (2014).”
- Emissions trading and firm innovation: Evidence from a natural experiment in China (2020, background): “The literature has consistently documented that such regulations improve technological innovation in energy conservation and emissions reduction (Fowlie, 2010; Hering and Poncet, 2014; Calel and Dechezlepretre, 2016).”
- National and Sub-national Policies and Institutions (2014, background): “In contrast, dynamic efficiency has played a minor role 19 in explaining cost savings in the US SO2 allowance program (e.g., Ellerman et al., 2000; Fowlie, 2010; 20 Kumar and Managi, 2010).”
- Greenwash vs. Brownwash: Exaggeration and Undue Modesty in Corporate Sustainability Disclosure (2015, background): “Indeed, prior research has found that deregulation leads firms to reduce their substantive capital-intensive investments in environmental protection (Fowlie 2010).”