Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide

By Anique J. Scheerder, A. V. van Deursen, J. V. van Dijk. Telematics and informatics, 2017

1,114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Media Technology, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7f2ffef5c0cf456109fe97d9f353098e2ff004a2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. S. van der Linden
2. Thomas Nygren
3. J. Roozenbeek
4. A. V. van Deursen
5. J. V. van Dijk
6. E. van Laar
7. Jos de Haan
8. Stephan Lewandowsky

In Media Technology

1. A. V. van Deursen
2. J. V. van Dijk
3. E. van Laar
4. Thomas Nygren
5. Jos de Haan
6. Ellen J. Helsper

In Political Science and International Relations

1. J. V. van Dijk
2. A. V. van Deursen
3. E. van Laar
4. Jos de Haan
5. J. Roozenbeek
6. S. van der Linden

Citations in the corpus

• The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access (2018, methodology): “…that are frequently considered in digital divide research, albeit under other labels such as economic, social, and cultural capital, include possession, income, and access to a social network (for a review of inequalities between persons, positions, and resources, see Scheerder et al., 2017).”
• Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review (2020, background): “This is in line with a previous systematic literature review which showed that digital skills studies are largely limited to demographic and socioeconomic determinants (Hargittai, 2010; Scheerder et al., 2017).”
• Prebunking interventions based on the psychological theory of “inoculation” can reduce susceptibility to misinformation across cultures. (2020, background): “Previous research has also acknowledged a problematic digital divide between groups in society where the productive use of online information is associated with socio-economic status (Scheerder et al., 2017).”