Effect of a structural intervention for the prevention of intimate-partner violence and HIV in rural South Africa: a cluster randomised trial.
By P. Pronyk, J. Hargreaves, Julia C. Kim, L. Morison, G. Phetla, C. Watts, J. Busza, J. Porter. The Lancet, 2006
951 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Health, Infectious Diseases
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7f21e4aa1a8462c0c460fc565baa8634b146516c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
In Health
Citations in the corpus
- Impact of Stepping Stones on incidence of HIV and HSV-2 and sexual behaviour in rural South Africa: cluster randomised controlled trial (2008, background): “Three randomised controlled trials have been conducted in Africa with both behavioural and other interventions (management of sexually transmitted infection, microfinance, community action, or health service strengthening) in community and school settings.”
- Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health. (2014, methodology): “[77] Pronyk PM, Hargreaves JR, Kim JC, Morison LA, Phetla G, Watts C, et al.”
- How does economic empowerment affect women's risk of intimate partner violence in low and middle income countries? A systematic review of published evidence (2009, background): “In Mexico, more than 10 years of education was associated with significantly lower moderate and severe physical violence compared with only 6 years of education (Rivera-Rivera et al., 2004) and in South Africa, post-school education was associated with significantly lower physical violence and physi”
- On Norms and Agency: Conversations about Gender Equality with Women and Men in 20 Countries (2013, background): “When prompted about their hopes for 41 see for example, World Development Report 2012, Pronyk et al. (2006), Panda and Agarwal (2005), swaminathan, Walker, and Rugadya (2008), and Aizer (2010).”
- Understanding the impact of a microfinance-based intervention on women's empowerment and the reduction of intimate partner violence in South Africa. (2007, methodology): “Adjusted risk ratios were generated for all outcome data at follow-up, accounting for baseline differences, marital status, and data clustering at the village level.(44)”
- Effectiveness of Primary Prevention Efforts for Intimate Partner Violence (2013, methodology): “These include two community-based interventions (Wolfe et al., 2003; Pronyk et al., 2006), two couples-based interventions (Markman et al., 1993; Florsheim et al., 2011), and one family-based approach (Foshee et al., in press).”
- The Effect of Cash, Vouchers, and Food Transfers on Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in Northern Ecuador (2016, positive): “…to account for the endogeniety of income or economic status have used exogenous variation in either demand or supply of labor ( Aizer 2010, Chin 2012 or randomized allocation of microfinance ( Pronyk et al. 2006 , and have found a negative relationship between a woman’s economic status and IPV.”
- Microfinance: Creating Opportunities for the Poor? (2010, background): “There were more modest or marginal effects at the household and community levels (Pronyk et al., 2006).”
- Can self-help group programs improve women’s empowerment? A systematic review (2017, methodology): “Two SHGs from India and South Africa were discussed in two quantitative papers (Garikipati 2008; Garikipati 2012; Kim et al. 2009; Pronyk et al. 2006).”
- Economic Self-Help group Programs for Improving Women's Empowerment: A Systematic Review (2015, methodology): “Kim et al., 2009, and Pronyk et al., 2006 Medium risk of bias Low risk of bias Medium risk of bias Medium risk of bias It is not clear whether the randomization was successful.”
- Interventions to promote social cohesion in sub-Saharan Africa (2010, methodology): “right-most four columns show the results of a synthesis and homogeneity test, based on recommendations in Rothman et al. (2008, pp. 668–673). The synthesis provides our best guess of what is the ‘actual’ effect of a CDD intervention on the outcome in question given the available evidence. The validi”