Development of subordinate-level categorization in 3- to 7-month-old infants.

By Paul C. Quinn. 2004

56 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Genetics

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Clay Mash
2. Marc H. Bornstein
3. Martha E. Arterberry

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Marc H. Bornstein
2. Martha E. Arterberry
3. Clay Mash

In Genetics

1. Clay Mash
2. Marc H. Bornstein
3. Martha E. Arterberry

Citations in the corpus

• THE DEVELOPMENT OF OBJECT CATEGORIZATION IN YOUNG CHILDREN: HIERARCHICAL INCLUSIVENESS, AGE, PERCEPTUAL ATTRIBUTE, AND GROUP VERSUS INDIVIDUAL ANALYSES (2010, background): “Some objects used in the current study (dogs and horses at L2) and others showing even finer discriminations (different breeds of cats at L3) have been shown to be discriminable by children as young or younger than those studied here (e.g., 3 to 4 months in Quinn, 2004).”
• Infant Categorization of Faces: Ladies First. (2005, unknown): “…with exemplars from the category (e.g., Homa & Vosburgh, 1976); (2) preferences for other objects (e.g., Eimas & Quinn, 1994); and (3) the range of perceptual diVerences among the category members (e.g., French, Mareschal, Mermillod, & Quinn, 2004; Oakes & Spalding, 1997; Quinn et al., 1993).”
• Experience-Based and On-Line Categorization of Objects in Early Infancy (2010, background): “If infant categorization of nonhuman animals in the laboratory is assisted by their real-world experiences with nonhuman animals occurring before arrival at the laboratory, Quinn (2004) argued, one might expect having home pets to facilitate infants’ animal categorization performance.”