Superconducting quantum bits
By John Clarke, Frank K. Wilhelm. Nature, 2008
1,268 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ee1053ce63f33a62f2ea555547c514ce5f21054
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Franco Nori
- Sahel Ashhab
- Steven M. Girvin
- Alexandre Blais
- Andreas Wallraff
- Göran Wendin
- A. Grimsmo
- Jukka P. Pekola
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Franco Nori
- Sahel Ashhab
- Steven M. Girvin
- Alexandre Blais
- Andreas Wallraff
- Göran Wendin
- Can-Ming Hu
- A. Grimsmo
Citations in the corpus
- Natural and artificial atoms for quantum computation (2010, background): “By introducing nonlinearity through the Josephson junction, the energy-level separation becomes nonuniform, and the lowest two levels can be used to encode the qubit [4, 3] (see also Box 1).”
- Landau-Zener-Stückelberg interferometry (2009, neutral): “For reviews see [(Makhlin et al., 2001), (Devoret and Martinis, 2004), (You and Nori, 2005), (Wendin and Shumeiko, 2007), (Zagoskin and Blais, 2007), and (Clarke and Wilhelm, 2008)].”
- Circuit quantum electrodynamics (2020, background): “The spectrum of ĤT is controlled by the ratio EJ/EC , with different values of this ratio corresponding to different types of superconducting qubits; see for example the reviews (Clarke and Wilhelm, 2008; Kjaergaard et al., 2019; Makhlin et al., 2001; Zagoskin and Blais, 2007).”
- Colloquium : Quantum heat transport in condensed matter systems (2021, background): “Different types of superconducting quantum bits, e.g. flux, charge and transmon qubits to mention a few common ones, are options in such devices (Clarke and Wilhelm, 2008).”