Distribution and Redistribution: The Shadow of the Nineteenth Century

By Torben Iversen, D. Soskice. 2009

302 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ee07592ec5289f612a2ef42d057d8f239592c4a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Marius R. Busemeyer
2. John S. Ahlquist
3. J. Pontusson
4. Christine Trampusch
5. P. Hall
6. David Rueda
7. M. Jæger
8. J. Finnegan

In Public Administration

1. John S. Ahlquist
2. Marius R. Busemeyer
3. J. Pontusson
4. Christine Trampusch
5. J. Finnegan
6. David Rueda
7. P. Hall
8. S. Thewissen

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Marius R. Busemeyer
2. P. Hall
3. M. Jæger
4. J. Pontusson
5. David Rueda
6. S. Thewissen
7. John S. Ahlquist
8. Christine Trampusch

Citations in the corpus

• Labor Unions, Political Representation, and Economic Inequality (2017, background): “Taking a longer view, Iversen & Soskice (2009) and Thelen (2004) trace historical antecedents to the nineteenth century.”
• Institutions, Climate Change, and the Foundations of Long-Term Policymaking (2019, background): “Across the high-income democracies, electoral rules tend to go together with forms of interest group intermediation, constituting the institutional basis of democratic and capitalist diversity (Crouch, 1993; Iversen & Soskice, 2009; Lijphart, 2012; Martin & Swank, 2012).”
• The effect of macroeconomic and social conditions on the demand for redistribution: A pseudo panel approach (2013, methodology): “…in political economy argues that individuals with different levels of education and working in different industries face different exposure to global competition and, as a consequence, they develop different demands for distribution (for example, Iversen and Soskice, 2001, 2009; Rehm, 2009).”
• Review Article: Comparative Political Science and the Study of Education (2011, background): “…Soskice (2007), the introduction of PR systems in countries that were later characterized as CMEs hinged on the support of employers, who viewed PR as an effective means to create the cross-class co-operation required to promote investment in ‘co-specific’ assets (see also Iversen & Soskice 2009).”
• The Politics of Inequality: Voter Mobilization and Left Parties in Advanced Industrial States (2010, background): “Iversen and Soskice (2009) offer yet another solution, arguing that coordinated market economies and political systems based on proportional representation jointly give rise to compression of wage differentials as well as redistributive welfare states.”
• Automation and the Welfare State: Technological Change as a Determinant of Redistribution Preferences (2019, background): “As these forms of social security (such as unemployment benefits or social assistance) are redistributive,3 redistribution preferences for individuals exposed to these risks will be high (Moene & Wallerstein, 2001; Sinn, 1995; Iversen & Soskice, 2001, 2009; Rehm, 2009).”
• Varieties of Capitalism: Trajectories of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity (2012, unknown): “…social policy, is only tenuously which producer-group politics and the dynamics of change in complementary institutional arenas (industrial relations and training, for example) impinge on and interact with social policy outcomes (exceptions include Iversen & Soskice 2009b and Palier & Thelen 2010).”