Global distribution of wave amplitudes and wave normal angles of chorus waves using THEMIS wave observations
By Wen Li, Jacob Bortnik, R. Thorne, V. Angelopoulos. 2011
279 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ea0eeee0bbec2e8232d1e7cd4e4a1012359f45c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
In Molecular Biology
Citations in the corpus
- An unusual enhancement of low‐frequency plasmaspheric hiss in the outer plasmasphere associated with substorm‐injected electrons (2013, background): “More recent refinements in the ray tracing show that most of the characteristic features of plasmaspheric hiss can be explained using chorus as the embryonic source [Bortnik et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2012a, 2012b].”
- Electron losses from the radiation belts caused by EMIC waves (2014, background): “Chorus waves tend to be most significant outside the plasmapause on the dawnside during active conditions [Meredith et al., 2001, 2012; Li et al., 2011].”
- Statistics of whistler mode waves in the outer radiation belt: Cluster STAFF‐SA measurements (2013, background): “Nevertheless, it has mainly been studied in the vicinity of the equator [Hayakawa et al., 1984; Lauben et al., 2002; Goldstein and Tsurutani, 1984; Burton and Holzer, 1974; Agapitov et al., 2010; Li et al., 2011; Agapitov et al., 2011a].”
- Statistical properties of plasmaspheric hiss derived from Van Allen Probes data and their effects on radiation belt electron dynamics (2015, background): “…chorus waves typically observed in the plasmatrough region with frequencies between 0.1 and 0.8 fce, where fce is the electron cyclotron frequency [e.g., Burtis and Helliwell, 1969; Burton and Holzer, 1974; Tsurutani and Smith, 1974, 1977; Meredith et al., 2003, 2012; Li et al., 2009, 2011].”
- Radiation belt electron acceleration by chorus waves during the 17 March 2013 storm (2014, background): “…wave normal angle distribution, that is, θlc = 0°, θuc = 45°, θm = 0°, and θw = 30° [e.g., Horne et al., 2005b; Thorne et al., 2013], to represent the quasi-parallel lower-band chorus waves particularly during active times [e.g., Li et al., 2011; Agapitov et al., 2013; Artemyev et al., 2013].”
- Constructing the global distribution of chorus wave intensity using measurements of electrons by the POES satellites and waves by the Van Allen Probes (2013, methodology): “We assume a typical chorus wave frequency spectrum and wave normal distributions based on statistical results [Meredith et al., 2012; Li et al., 2011, 2013].”
- Modeling radiation belt electron dynamics during GEM challenge intervals with the DREAM3D diffusion model (2013, background): “There is increasing observational and theoretical evidence of oblique chorus and hiss waves in the radiation belts [Li et al., 2011; Bortnik et al., 2011], which could significantly affect the pitch angle and momentum diffusion coefficients derived from the wave properties [Albert, 2008].”
- Global model of lower band and upper band chorus from multiple satellite observations (2012, methodology): “Our results show that there is little or no upper band chorus wave activity beyond L* = 7, consistent with previous studies [Santolík et al., 2005; Li et al., 2011].”
- Three‐dimensional electron radiation belt simulations using the BAS Radiation Belt Model with new diffusion models for chorus, plasmaspheric hiss, and lightning‐generated whistlers (2014, background): “More importantly, the AE index is a better indicator of substorm activity than Kp and the enhanced chorus waves responsible for electron acceleration are known to be associated with substorm activity [Smith et al., 1996; Meredith et al., 2001, 2012; Miyoshi et al., 2011; Li et al., 2009b, 2011].”