Influence of secular variation of the geomagnetic field on production rates of in situ produced cosmogenic nuclides

By T. Dunai. 2001

362 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atmospheric Science, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e9a65d530d36b9f811415cf7ff8187858c80f59

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. G. Balco
2. N. Lifton
3. Marek Zreda
4. Darin Desilets
5. Pieter Vermeesch
6. T. Prabu
7. J. Stone
8. Brian Borchers

In Atmospheric Science

1. G. Balco
2. Marek Zreda
3. N. Lifton
4. Darin Desilets
5. Pieter Vermeesch
6. Brian Borchers
7. S. Marrero
8. F. Phillips

In Molecular Biology

1. G. Balco
2. N. Lifton
3. Marek Zreda
4. Darin Desilets
5. Pieter Vermeesch
6. T. Prabu
7. Brian Borchers
8. S. Marrero

Citations in the corpus

• Scaling in situ cosmogenic nuclide production rates using analytical approximations to atmospheric cosmic-ray fluxes (2014, background): “Although Hatton (1971) noted that the two main neutron monitor designs yielded different multiplicity responses, Lifton et al.”
• Cosmogenic nuclide chronology of millennial-scale glacial advances during O-isotope stage 2 in Patagonia (2004, background): “In general, non-dipole effects at 46 8 S latitude and 400–500 masl may change production rates by , 2%, and furthermore, they are insignificant for moraines greater than 20 ka (Gosse and Phillips, 2001; Dunai, 2001).”
• CosmoCalc: An Excel add‐in for cosmogenic nuclide calculations (2007, background): “On the one hand, this temporal variability is the biggest downside to Rc-based models for long exposures (>20 ka [Dunai, 2001]).”
• Extended scaling factors for in situ cosmogenic nuclides: New measurements at low latitude (2006, methodology): “Parameters previously used to describe geomagnetic shielding effects were geomagnetic latitude calculated from a dipole model [22], geomagnetic latitude calculated from a high-order field approximation [23], surface values of geomagnetic inclination [24] and cutoff rigidity calculated from surface v”
• Geological calibration of spallation production rates in the CRONUS-Earth project (2016, methodology): “Canary 435 Islands sites CAN-Y and CAN-O are described in Dunai & Wijbrans (2000). 436 Sicily sites SCLY-O and SCLY-Y and Hawaii sites HAW-O, HAW-M, and 437 HAW-Y are described in Blard et al. (2006). Site YAP is described in Cerling 438 & Craig (1994); Licciardi et al. (1999). Sites SBLK, CL, and L”