Recent Progress in Bioarchaeology: Approaches to the Osteological Paradox

By L. E. Wright, C. Yoder. 2003

238 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Archeology, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e977fffb65ba279d9d88a861f6332a3a96535ce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Archeology

1. K. Knudson
2. C. Stojanowski

In Paleontology

1. I. Barnes
2. K. Knudson
3. C. Stojanowski

Citations in the corpus

• Assessing ancient DNA studies. (2005, background): “presupposed that direct relationships existed between statistics calculated from archaeological skeletal series and the health status of past populations (‘the osteological paradox’ [39, 40 ]).”
• New Directions in Bioarchaeology: Recent Contributions to the Study of Human Social Identities (2008, background): “As an academic specialization, bioarchaeology coherently unites the disparate subfields of anthropology by combining aspects of both the biological and social sciences (Buikstra and Beck 2006; Katzenberg and Saunders 2000; Larsen 1997, 2002; Wright and Yoder 2003).”