Assessing ancient DNA studies.

By M. Gilbert, H. Bandelt, M. Hofreiter, I. Barnes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2005

623 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Animal DNA in PCR reagents plagues ancient DNA research (2007, background): “DNA from these three species may be transferred to samples during handling, resulting in sample contamination ( Gilbert et al., 2005 ).”
DNA-based methods in paleolimnology: new opportunities for investigating long-term dynamics of lacustrine biodiversity (2017, background): “Recommendations for the analysis of ancient DNA (Cooper and Poinar 2000; Gilbert et al. 2005) are applicable to work on DNA archived in sediments.”
The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics (2016, background): “…should be used to ''correct'' co-sequenced eDNA data (Nguyen et al. 2015), but the transparent and self-critical cognitive approach recommended by Gilbert et al. (2005) for ancient DNA is highly applicable to all eDNA studies, particularly those with conservation applications where substantial…”
Ancient plant DNA in archaeobotany (2008, background): “the ancient origin of the DNA sequences found (Pääbo et al. 2004; Gilbert et al. 2005).”